References and further reading

Guides to designing MCQs

Other sources

  • Alldridge P (1997) ‘Multiple choice examining in law’ 31 The Law Teacher 167 (describes the advantages and disadvantages of introducing multiple choice examining in a law module)
  • Bobb-Semple C et al (1997) Inns of Court School of Law: Test yourself in evidence, civil procedure, criminal procedure, sentencing (4th ed) London: Blackstone Press (the BVC text containing sample questions and an analysis of misconceptions in multiple choice examining)
  • Bush M (1999) Alternative marking schemes for online multiple choice tests [PDF format] (considers scoring options for MCQs, including use of negative marking and normalisation)
  • Leon P (2002) ‘Log on to student motivation’ Times Higher Education Supplement 3 May (describes the use of formative Web-based MCQs to complement face-to-face teaching)
  • Paxton M (2000) ‘A linguistic perspective on multiple choice questioning’ 25
    Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2 (a critique of the emphasis on multiple choice testing as a response to increasing student numbers in South Africa)
  • Quanjel-Schreurs L et al (2002) ‘A digital programme for advocacy’ 36 The Law Teacher 15
  • Webb J (2002) Portfolio-based learning and assessment in law (UKCLE teaching resource note)

Last Modified: 4 June 2010